Monday, April 24, 2006

The Downside Of Blogging

I had shelves lined with other people's prose while my best efforts
were buried on a Web site somewhere, underneath a lot of blah-blah about American Idol and my kitty cat.
Ouch! From an essay on Slate. I'd kinda been thinking the same thing, but I'm still in the early-romance phase of blogging, and since I've been lazy and unproductive as a writer for YEARS, blogging seems to be a decent way to get the juices flowing and at least get some immediate feedback (bad or good) that could prompt further words.

But blogging does not a writer make. It is way too easy (as my three regular readers have no doubt noticed) to just paste up a YouTube link or a funny ha-ha and not even make the effort to compose something. It also scratches the immediate itch -- it encourages quick response and little deliberation. That's bad and good. Often the first instinct a writer has is the right one, and I know I tend to get smothered in second-guessing if I don't get that first burst of words out on paper. But to be good at it requires discipline and a willingness to edit -- not something blogs excel at.

At which blogs excel.

SEE?

2 comments:

Dave Miller said...

(tired of my comments yet?)

Which is why I have a little place I call home at Newsvine. There I get to write long-form... if I ever have anything to say beyond a paragraph or two. But she is right in a sense that if you are a serious writer, getting published on that stuff called paper is really what you want... I think.

(done commenting for now)

Bitter Old Punk said...

Hey! I'm on Newsvine, too. I'll add you to my watch list.